Home > Religion > Intellectual midgets

Intellectual midgets

Religion: The Accepted InsanityOn Comment is Fallacious I noticed an article entitled ‘Agnostic about atheism,’ which really should have been enough to trigger the warning sirens. Apparently atheists are the new evangelicals, apparently we are ‘tone deaf’ in failing to appreciate that European culture and music comes from religion, and we deprive ourselves of great foods because great food is religious, such as halal and kosher.

The author, one Tracy Quan, evidently feels that writing chick-lit and knowing which purse to keep her dildo in qualifies her to comment on what atheists are and aren’t.

I think that Tracy Quan needs to stop reading Cosmo and perhaps take on some rather more serious literature, beginning with anything remotely connected to the attacks currently being made upon separation of church and state. Of course atheists are inclined to vociferously attack religion: it’s the cultural archetype for many of the most frightening political ideas currently being advanced by the Right.

If Richard Dawkins sounds a little more strident than Bertrand Russell, I imagine it’s because the western world wasn’t living in fear of the twin threats of airplanes express delivered to their major landmarks or another fruitcake fundamentalist POTUS to vindicate Samuel Huntington. Also Bertrand Russell didn’t have to share a world with people like Pat Robertson and his disciples.

As for the rest, Quan declares, “Run from religion, if you must, but you can’t hide from song, sculpture, poetry, architecture, painting, tourism or food.” Pithy. All song, sculpture, poetry, architecture, painting, tourism and food are related to religion? I have never been one to gainsay the culture power of Christianity, particularly in regard to music, but does anyone believe that this power is anything to do with the beliefs of Christianity?

Quan cites as an example the music of Giovanni Palestrina, musical director of the Julian Chapel. He was funded by the church. Indeed most art was created using the resources of the church; if talented musicians and sculptors wanted work, they went to the largest peddlers of patronage. Organised religions. The depths of Quan’s lack of knowledge is shown completely when she cites Benjamin Britten as part of the cultural tradition of religion.

Arguably, Britten’s most famous work is not religious: the Young Person’s Guide to the Orchestra. Even though Britten wrote a great deal of music for the church, many of composers to whom he looked for example weren’t particularly religious either. Mahler, and Stravinsky in particular were emblematic of the collapsing patronage of the church in the face of rising secular operatic and musical institutions.

Quan might gripe that atheists seem to reject the cultural heritage provided by gilded churches and cathedrals, but what of sites such as the Colosseum of Rome, the Eiffel Tower, the Statue of Liberty, the Kremlin, the Brandenburg Gate? The cultural monuments of the western world go far beyond the merely religious. The Basilica of St. Peter is not all there is to Rome, I’m happy to say, despite its grandeur.

Yet at the root, Quan’s complaints seem to ultimately reside in the embarrassment she feels whenever atheists get on their metaphorical soapboxes to attack religion. Whether Hitchen’s phrase, “god is not great” or the concept that religion causes war, Quan wonders why we atheists have to indulge in such excess. Evidently Quan really is as ignorant as one might expect from an author of chick-lit.

Anyone speaking out against cultural norms seems to be speaking in excess. Religion has had centuries to become the ‘norm’ in our culture, despite the great and growing numbers of atheists and agnostics. It carries with it the air of respectability; one feels almost apologetic when informing the religious that actually you don’t share their mores and prejudices. One feels mean-spirited when rebutting those who want to ask if you’ve been saved.

Yet why should we permit the current status-quo to persist? A sizable chunk of Christians regularly complain, whether through the pages of the Daily Mail or in Parliament, that they’re being discriminated against through equality legislation etc. Yet the tendency to secularize is actually correcting a previous imbalance, and if arguments against religion need to be advanced along the way, then so be it.

Perhaps I’m just upset that Melanie Phillips hasn’t written an article denouncing me yet.

About these ads
Categories: Religion
  1. Lewis
    May 27, 2008 at 10:35 am

    Two words: Liberal Democrat.

  2. May 27, 2008 at 10:40 am

    I don’t understand Lewis: isn’t Quan American and a New York based spokesperson for a prostitution advocacy group?

    At any rate, I know a few Lib Dems who are a lot better on the subject of secularism and atheism than a great deal of our fellow Party members. One of them even contributes to this website.

  3. AlexMagd
    May 27, 2008 at 10:52 am

    Eh it’s unfair to lump the Lib Dems in with other backwards types. Evan Harris is a Lib Dem and he’s the driving force behind secularism in Parliament at the moment.

    I very much hate chick-lit, the tacky rubbish. A marketed counterpart to Chris Ryan and his pointless writing ‘career’ is not qualified to make sweeping statements about atheism on a public website. Fortunately this means I can totally disregard her opinion, sit back and listen to Mozart’s ‘Requiem’. What? He was religious you say? No, wait, he wasn’t. In fact a huge number of famous musicians throughout history rejected organised religion and lived by their own morality, writing religious music because the Church was willing to pay them to do it. Gah!

  4. May 27, 2008 at 10:55 am

    Absolutely Alex – I completely concur, though unfortunately for me, I simply don’t have the will power to ignore this sort of thing. It drives me utterly crazy.

  5. Lewis
    May 27, 2008 at 11:48 am

    You’re right Dave, it was a bit of a jerk reaction – back in Colchester we’ve been having heated debates with some Lib Dems on exactly this topic. But I agree, on a national scale they’re pretty good. Apologies to any liberal contributors offended =).

  6. May 27, 2008 at 11:51 am

    Hehe, no sweat – I just can’t have any pride in the Labour Party on the issue of religion when we consider key people like Blair, right down to the several bigots on Members’ Net.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 126 other followers

%d bloggers like this: