Home > Labour Party News > Fun times in Erith and Thamesmead

Fun times in Erith and Thamesmead

So Georgia Gould has failed to get selected to Erith and Thamesmead, for the present, as the selection process has been suspended. I don’t know if anyone has been following the storm in a tea cup, but apparently someone believed a ballot box had been tampered with and so called off the selection. Presumably the person in question was one of the centrally-delegated flunkeys, since the NEC took over control of the CLP last week, after all sorts of allegations began flying about regarding a corruption of the postal votes process.

I have a few thoughts. The first of which is this: presumably, since it’s not even 9am yet, the ballot box has no ballots inside it yet, since the final hustings won’t have been held? And secondly, if it has postal votes inside it, then surely these can be verified against the relatively small party membership of 250-odd people, rather than re-run the selection. Which leads me to thirdly; is there some other reason to call off the selection process? Media furore has been slowly building all week – from Guardian to Mail. How does this tie in?

Call me cynical, but I think the suspension is political, rather than a genuine administrative worry. There are two major factions by all accounts – Georgia Gould, endorsed by Alistair Campbell and one or two other arch-Blairites, and Rachel Maskell, apparently a ‘Brownite’, either of whom might gain from some added time to canvass / let accusations of nepotism die down. It is these accusations of nepotism which seem to be motivating the press – Gould is the 22 year old daughter of Lord Philip Gould.

Additionally, Gould has had a lot of professional PR from bbm, a firm run by Labour insiders, a firm which has also been interfering in Calder Valley, where my good friend and good socialist Susan Press came second in the selection process, behind a NuLab preference. Some of the support has been comedic, such as the release which put these words in Georgia’s mouth, “Virginia was one of the ‘swing’ states and although I can’t claim to have won it single-handedly for Obama…

Nevertheless, presumably Georgia is happy to have a professional machine sew up the nomination for her rather than relying on her personality and politics. Well…her personality I can’t speak to since I didn’t spend much time socialising with the Oxford University Labour Club – but as for her politics, if she has any, she never demonstrated them. In fact I can wholly endorse whatever London Young Labour official said to the Guardian, “I can think of at least 20 young people who have been very active for years and they are not getting considered for a seat.”

The overriding message we get from bbm’s campaign for Georgia, 20-page glossy included, and from the NEC handling of selections generally is “Never say anything out of place, never utter a controversial sentiment and you’ll get selected. Be the drone you wish to see in the world.” I’m told the outgoing MP has written to his party members recommending four other candidates other than the top two, though the source for that is not the best – that’s how bad things are getting within Labour these days and I’m not sure I want to be part of it.

About these ads
Categories: Labour Party News
  1. April 18, 2009 at 10:16 am

    You think the suspension is ‘political’ and will give more time to both candidates etc.? Another more straightforward ‘political’ analysis is that Ms Gould was losing, and that her team may now cry foul against the others and try to get them disqualified for breaking rules about press contact etc etc.

    My astonishment at the crass stupidity and anger at the nepotism of the inner circle goes beyond its normal bounds of party loyalty on this one, I’m happy to admit.

    But, measured that I try to be, I’m not going to blame G Gould for it personally, and I think her comment on the swinf state and single-handed winning can be taken as a joke. Surely. Please. I still need faith in humanity.

  2. April 18, 2009 at 10:35 am

    Could be. But the blame must be laid squarely at the door of the candidate – whoever they are. The swing-state thing aside, employing a PR company and expending a great deal of money on the selection process is a corruption of the internal democracy of the Party – especially as I’ll bet the tranche of money being spent didn’t come from activists in the constituency but either from her millionaire parents or their various allies in the upper echelons.

  3. April 19, 2009 at 4:57 am

    It’s worth noting that Kevin Maguire has been pushing the Gould/nepotism story all week – actually, all month – warning against central interference in the selection process.

    It seemed a slightly odd choice of diversion from the smeargate story until I understood that the problem with this particular brand of “outside interference” was that Gould is merely the *wrong kind* of parachuted candidate, ie a Blairite not a Brownite, if those distinctions still make any sense.

    So at least one hack is still loyally taking orders from No.10…

  4. April 19, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    Yeah I noticed that – I read his pieces on the Mirror website. Quite hilarious, since the pieces are so clearly tendentious.

  1. April 22, 2009 at 4:11 pm
  2. May 19, 2009 at 9:14 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 126 other followers

%d bloggers like this: