<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunder&#8217;s broom for the blogosphere&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/04/20/sunders-broom-for-the-blogosphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/04/20/sunders-broom-for-the-blogosphere/</link>
	<description>&#34;We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run down&#34; - Aneurin Bevan, 1953</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:40:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Semple</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/04/20/sunders-broom-for-the-blogosphere/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Semple]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=617#comment-1478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your writing - and mine - and the actions and words of Derek Draper say things about who each of us are as people every bit as much as they say things about what policies we&#039;d like to see implemented and what opinions we hold.

If you think the conclusions I&#039;ve drawn - about you or about Draper (!) - are wrong, say so and give your counter argument. All you&#039;ve managed to present so far is moralising. Finally, no, none of the newspapers in question are the Daily Mail...at least not on the first four pages of Google.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your writing &#8211; and mine &#8211; and the actions and words of Derek Draper say things about who each of us are as people every bit as much as they say things about what policies we&#8217;d like to see implemented and what opinions we hold.</p>
<p>If you think the conclusions I&#8217;ve drawn &#8211; about you or about Draper (!) &#8211; are wrong, say so and give your counter argument. All you&#8217;ve managed to present so far is moralising. Finally, no, none of the newspapers in question are the Daily Mail&#8230;at least not on the first four pages of Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Harris</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/04/20/sunders-broom-for-the-blogosphere/#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=617#comment-1477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are shades of homophobia and transphobia; the use of the schoolyard term &quot;gay&quot; is probably the lighest shade of homophobia.

David is one of those newspapers the Daily Mail?

I think you have used homophobic langugage. I think it&#039;s indicative of a streak of aggresiveness; I note you want to &quot;emasculate&quot; Derek Draper. Can you not accept that other people have other opinions than yourself? Your piece (above) about me is deeply personal - it&#039;s a trait of the hard-left, demonise the opponent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are shades of homophobia and transphobia; the use of the schoolyard term &#8220;gay&#8221; is probably the lighest shade of homophobia.</p>
<p>David is one of those newspapers the Daily Mail?</p>
<p>I think you have used homophobic langugage. I think it&#8217;s indicative of a streak of aggresiveness; I note you want to &#8220;emasculate&#8221; Derek Draper. Can you not accept that other people have other opinions than yourself? Your piece (above) about me is deeply personal &#8211; it&#8217;s a trait of the hard-left, demonise the opponent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/04/20/sunders-broom-for-the-blogosphere/#comment-1476</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=617#comment-1476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m intrigued by the implied notion that it&#039;s possible to use deliberate homophobic language (as you contend Dave was doing) and not actually be homophobic.  By extension, what methods of communication or action do actually constitute homophobia?  Is a person only homophobic if s/he physcially assaults a gay person?

I know it was only a throwaway line on a comment thread, Michael, but blimey...

Anyway, don&#039;t let me get in the way of your more substantive debate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m intrigued by the implied notion that it&#8217;s possible to use deliberate homophobic language (as you contend Dave was doing) and not actually be homophobic.  By extension, what methods of communication or action do actually constitute homophobia?  Is a person only homophobic if s/he physcially assaults a gay person?</p>
<p>I know it was only a throwaway line on a comment thread, Michael, but blimey&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, don&#8217;t let me get in the way of your more substantive debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Semple</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/04/20/sunders-broom-for-the-blogosphere/#comment-1475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Semple]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=617#comment-1475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may be how the term started, but a quick internet sweep and I can see that I&#039;m far from the only person using it in a non-homophobic sense including two national newspapers and the Mirror. At any rate, you have now dropped any pretence at sticking to the point in favour of this side-show about whether or not the term &quot;Dolly&quot; when applied to Derek Draper is homophobic. Finally, &quot;Dolly&quot; is punchier than &quot;self-loving, over-scented clerk&quot;, whilst being equally emasculating, as befits just one more bloodless drone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be how the term started, but a quick internet sweep and I can see that I&#8217;m far from the only person using it in a non-homophobic sense including two national newspapers and the Mirror. At any rate, you have now dropped any pretence at sticking to the point in favour of this side-show about whether or not the term &#8220;Dolly&#8221; when applied to Derek Draper is homophobic. Finally, &#8220;Dolly&#8221; is punchier than &#8220;self-loving, over-scented clerk&#8221;, whilst being equally emasculating, as befits just one more bloodless drone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Harris</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/04/20/sunders-broom-for-the-blogosphere/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=617#comment-1474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My accusation isn&#039;t that David is homophobic, but he has used homophobic langugage. Dolly is obviously derogative, and it doesn&#039;t take a genius to work out it&#039;s homophobic at that.

&quot;Mandy and Dolly&quot;, that&#039;s the slur, and it doesn&#039;t take a leap of the imagine to work out what that pertains to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My accusation isn&#8217;t that David is homophobic, but he has used homophobic langugage. Dolly is obviously derogative, and it doesn&#8217;t take a genius to work out it&#8217;s homophobic at that.</p>
<p>&#8220;Mandy and Dolly&#8221;, that&#8217;s the slur, and it doesn&#8217;t take a leap of the imagine to work out what that pertains to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/04/20/sunders-broom-for-the-blogosphere/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=617#comment-1473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael

I do feel I should stop by briefly to defend Dave here, not that he can&#039;t stick up for himself.

Speaking personally, I did not know that the way you indicate is how Derek Draper got his unfortunate nickname, and I do not know who started it.  If asked, I would have assumed it came the association with the term &#039;puppet&#039;, in reference to his, now shall we say, unswerving loyalty to mainstream Labour.  Only Dolly alliterates better.

I can say with integrity that, while I&#039;ve never used the nickname myself either in writing or verbally, I have not until now regarded it as in any way homophobic.  Perhaps I am just not close enough to the smear mill, whoever in Westminster is doing the smearing.

I do think you do David a disservice, and one which would anger me if I were accused of same, by suggesting he is deliberately using homophobic language.  His language may at time be robust and angry-sounding, but it is also laden with decent values.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael</p>
<p>I do feel I should stop by briefly to defend Dave here, not that he can&#8217;t stick up for himself.</p>
<p>Speaking personally, I did not know that the way you indicate is how Derek Draper got his unfortunate nickname, and I do not know who started it.  If asked, I would have assumed it came the association with the term &#8216;puppet&#8217;, in reference to his, now shall we say, unswerving loyalty to mainstream Labour.  Only Dolly alliterates better.</p>
<p>I can say with integrity that, while I&#8217;ve never used the nickname myself either in writing or verbally, I have not until now regarded it as in any way homophobic.  Perhaps I am just not close enough to the smear mill, whoever in Westminster is doing the smearing.</p>
<p>I do think you do David a disservice, and one which would anger me if I were accused of same, by suggesting he is deliberately using homophobic language.  His language may at time be robust and angry-sounding, but it is also laden with decent values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Harris</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/04/20/sunders-broom-for-the-blogosphere/#comment-1472</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=617#comment-1472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is &quot;Dolly&quot; a homophobic slur - or not?

The insinuation was that Derek Draper was in a homosexual relationship with Peter Mandleson, and you&#039;ve repeated that insinuation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is &#8220;Dolly&#8221; a homophobic slur &#8211; or not?</p>
<p>The insinuation was that Derek Draper was in a homosexual relationship with Peter Mandleson, and you&#8217;ve repeated that insinuation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Semple</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/04/20/sunders-broom-for-the-blogosphere/#comment-1471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Semple]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=617#comment-1471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Objectively, insinuating that a) most of the protest was by fashionable trustafarian students, b) that such people are incapable of a big idea beyond hating America and c) that we hate America is not just snobbery - inverted, ironic or otherwise - it&#039;s bigotry. And ignorance.

And yeah, I hate gays because I used the word Dolly. Are you fucking kidding me with this shit?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Objectively, insinuating that a) most of the protest was by fashionable trustafarian students, b) that such people are incapable of a big idea beyond hating America and c) that we hate America is not just snobbery &#8211; inverted, ironic or otherwise &#8211; it&#8217;s bigotry. And ignorance.</p>
<p>And yeah, I hate gays because I used the word Dolly. Are you fucking kidding me with this shit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Harris</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/04/20/sunders-broom-for-the-blogosphere/#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=617#comment-1470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Objectively, objecting to fashionable trustafarian students mouthing slogans isn&#039;t &#039;snobbery&#039;.

But what&#039;s more offensive David, my &quot;snobbery&quot;, or you repeating the homophobic label &quot;Dolly&quot; in relation to Derek Draper?

I&#039;d rather be nicking post-modernist language than the right-wing Guidoesque homophobic slur &quot;Dolly&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Objectively, objecting to fashionable trustafarian students mouthing slogans isn&#8217;t &#8216;snobbery&#8217;.</p>
<p>But what&#8217;s more offensive David, my &#8220;snobbery&#8221;, or you repeating the homophobic label &#8220;Dolly&#8221; in relation to Derek Draper?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather be nicking post-modernist language than the right-wing Guidoesque homophobic slur &#8220;Dolly&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Semple</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/04/20/sunders-broom-for-the-blogosphere/#comment-1469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Semple]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=617#comment-1469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deeply ironic or not, Michael, it clearly is snobbery - and your assumptions about the G20 movement clearly demonstrate that snobbery throughout the article, not just in the introduction.

Incidentally, if I haven&#039;t engaged with your &quot;central point&quot; in your eyes, it&#039;s because I dispute the entire premise of your article, and I&#039;ve made that clear enough. I have my &#039;big idea&#039; and I don&#039;t consider it invalidated, but nice to know you&#039;ve done years of research into Marxist and post-Marxist theory, and are well versed on the post-modernist tosh you threw around in that article like you&#039;re a first-year uni student.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deeply ironic or not, Michael, it clearly is snobbery &#8211; and your assumptions about the G20 movement clearly demonstrate that snobbery throughout the article, not just in the introduction.</p>
<p>Incidentally, if I haven&#8217;t engaged with your &#8220;central point&#8221; in your eyes, it&#8217;s because I dispute the entire premise of your article, and I&#8217;ve made that clear enough. I have my &#8216;big idea&#8217; and I don&#8217;t consider it invalidated, but nice to know you&#8217;ve done years of research into Marxist and post-Marxist theory, and are well versed on the post-modernist tosh you threw around in that article like you&#8217;re a first-year uni student.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

