Home > General Politics > Is Nick Cohen right about the BNP?

Is Nick Cohen right about the BNP?

Nick Cohen, who has been much derided recently, has published an article on Comment is Free denouncing the idea that the BNP are on the rise. The local government elections in Salford kept the BNP in third place, with only a small increase in their vote. To anti-fascist campaigners, Cohen attributes the view that the BNP is running out of funds and credible candidates. The notion of BNP success is being talked up by the media and the political elite as part of wider suspicions of popular power. On the part of politicians at least, this might be brought on perhaps by being found with their hands deep in the cookie jar.

To some extent this is bound to be correct. The media narrative of a fearful elite is palpable. Whether this is actually what people are thinking in Westminster, I can’t say. It would not surprise me if it was correct however – and even newspapers as staid as the Times have bought into the hype, leading me to suspect that there’s at least something to it. On the ground, I know that people are angry. Conversations in work and elsewhere when they turn to politics have regularly revolved around how despicably our MPs have behaved and about the upcoming European elections. Thankfully, however, no one I know is voting BNP – though that sample may be somewhat self-selecting.

Saying that, I wouldn’t be quite so ready to dismiss the threat of a BNP electoral coup as Cohen seems to be. Cohen himself quotes part of a revealing remark by fascist leader, Nick Griffin, to the effect that British people don’t want repatriation right now so the BNP will slip in the back door by talking about “identity”, until they can control the media and then it’ll be kick-off time on the streets or Burnley and Dagenham. This quote is not exceptional for its content, but for the fact that it was included at all. Most of the articles I have been reading mention nothing about the political policies of the BNP, instead focussing on the rise of the BNP and attempts to stop it.

Take this BBC article; it is about the response by the BNP to the calls by Archbishop’s Sentamu and Williams not to vote for extremist parties. It includes some text from the CoE release, and a lengthy quote from Griffin and a BNP spokesperson. In the latter, there is plenty of talk about how the British people won’t let MPs get away with the expenses scandal and so on – but nowhere in the article is a timely reminder about the numerous criminal convictions of various BNP personnel, nor about Griffin’s desire for racial purity. These are words which jangle against popular consciousness – and yet the media simply accept BNP rhetoric at face value.

How Griffin and his cohorts must laugh! Not only do they openly tell each other that they’ll talk in code and be civil while they try to get a grasp on some power, but the media buys it completely. Moreover, since the BNP are “controversial”, they’re a hot topic for the media to report on. This in turn makes them out to be more important than they actually are – inherent to which is the danger of self-fulfilling prophecy. It also distorts political discourse away from groups such as No2EU, Yes to Democracy, which could quite easily have more dedicated activists and be more grounded in the British working class than the BNP; the media seems to be strangely quick to forget just how fast the BNP were ousted from the Lindsey strike, or the posties up north who are refusing to deliver BNP leaflets (Hat Tip).

On that subject for a moment, if you get a BNP leaflet through your door and you are at home, do not simply bin it. Go and speak to the postman and ask him if he feels comfortable delivering these leaflets. Talk to your neighbours, then call the local CWU and ask if you can speak to your local branch about it. It’s not a question of political freedom, as Simon Darby, BNP spokesman, would make out. Its about stopping the BNP from performing the very acts of openly lying that their leader has told us he is going to perform. It’s about stopping racism, and undermining the ability to buy an election via leaflets simply because the media is too lazy to do a proper investigative job on the BNP.

If the BNP want these leaflets distributed, it’s entirely within the remit of the posties to collectively decide that BNP members will have to give them out on their own.

Moving back to the original topic however, I think it’s important not to dismiss the threat of the BNP. I’m all in favour of mobilising activists, trades unions and other groups against fascism via the Hope Not Hate campaign. However, that campaign strikes me as worryingly apolitical, bearing in mind that recent Households Below Average Income data shows the complete failure of New Labour’s third way guff when it comes to combatting the sharp end of capitalism (Hat Tip). Especially when considering our own methods of fightback, we do need to take the Right seriously because an electoral breakthrough for the BNP would be bad news.

Ignoring the issue of credibility for a moment (and they would certainly gain some of that), the biggest boost to the BNP would be financial. Our own domestic MPs have been greedily sticking their noses in the trough but the European Union is a spectacle to behold when it comes to doling out cash, as UKIP’s Nigel Farage would apparently be the first to admit. Handing the BNP two million quid to spend on promoting their ridiculous ideas would be seriously bad news – doubly so bearing in mind the media climate we’re in, wherein one only has to dig out an opposing press release in order to consider a piece of churnalism “balanced”, however tendentious or inadequate it may be.

It seems that this is just one more thing which Cohen has got just a little bit wrong, but another take can be found at Zebra Mbizi, which I’ve only today read for the first time. (Cartoon credits to SchNews, to which everyone should subscribe).

About these ads
Categories: General Politics
  1. May 25, 2009 at 8:00 am

    V briefly as I’m off out, Nick Cohen looks startlingly wrong to me, and I’ll explore why later either her or at my place.

    The threat from BNP is very real, very now. The fact that they didn’t make it happen in this bit Salford (which is where I’m from) is neither her nor there.

  2. May 25, 2009 at 9:07 am

    I agree that the threat is real; and I’ve approached that theme from multiple angles. I look forward to a supplement from a northern perspective.

  3. May 26, 2009 at 12:27 am

    The lack of context to reportage of the BNP is stunning, as you say. No mention of the racist violence or Holocaust denial.

    The more people know about the BNP the less likely they are to vote for them – my fear is that a great many people will be taken in thinking that if the mainstream parties and media are bashing them, then a vote for them is an anti-establishment vote.

    But Nick Griffin went to Oxford like Cameron and in power the BNP haven’t challenged the powers that be, let alone turn up to represent their constituents.

    It may be that Griffin’s intention will come true – they will be allowed to become a fixture of politics because they are unchallenging. With the three big parties agreed on almost everything, there’s a need for some dichotomy to prevent politics becoming a mere managerial affair and this is what the fascists are providing by donning suits and toning down the rhetoric.

  4. centurean2
    June 13, 2009 at 8:38 pm

    I am not a BNP member but one thing i do like is the truth.
    When last was there any violence coming from the BNP, certainly not in my lifetime!
    The violence comes from Antifa The UAF and such Communist groups.
    Here’s an independent report.

    http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?iy5voz1ohjn

    We have today in the UK a Fabian Fascist Government with Fabians across all parties.
    Very clever so many concentrate on the BNP Leaving the real Fascist’s alone!!
    Cambridge was Griffins university not the Fabian Oxford!
    Anyway NAZI’S were Socialist surely you know that- so which are the BNP left or right?
    Thats’ what Nazi means….NATIONAL SOCIALIST PARTY..GERMANY..
    Read their policies they are nearer to labour than they are distant!
    Only,
    unilke the Labour/Fabians the BNP havent used Hitlers policies- Smoking ban- enabling bill 1933 enabling act- sexualisation of children thats’ all coming from the EUSSR not the BNP!
    Cameras everywhere, now talk of Nazi fluoridation or mass mediacation used by Hitler in the Camps.

    2010 Crunch year,and nothing to do with the BNP at all- The EUMED Again all brought about by the three parties that corrupt the parliament today!!

    Wake up- the coffee has boiled over!
    My area adopted a BNP Guy three years ago to council, he’s been excellent so this year we adopted another one.
    Stoke has 7 on their council, not elected because they are bad at the job,
    Just the opposite, they do a damned good job my friends have no complaints and that includes Pakistani people in that area!
    Don’t tell me that you believe all you hear and read, thats’ why the media is very dangerous!

    At least they protect Britain and it’s Farmers etc unlike the other three that have sold the country to the EUSSR.
    Might i add,illegally under the 1689 ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS..BUT THEY MENTION THAT DO THEY- OUR THREE CORRUPTED PARTIES,OF TRAITORS!

    No foreign state—that does include Brussels!!

  5. June 26, 2009 at 8:29 pm

    The problem is that the main parties will not halt the tide of immigration into this country, and lots of people (me included) have simply had enough. Time to send people back home, especially if they are causing trouble over here, and CLOSE THE DOORS.

    I wouldn’t vote for the BNP because they have a silly hang-up about whiteness. It’s a shame really because they would garner a lot more support if they dropped the racist rhetoric.

  6. Max
    October 25, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    I hate the BNP. I will never vote BNP, They are racist, fachist, neo-nazi, white supremacists, islamaphobic, homophobic idiots.

    They are trying to fix something that isnt broken.

  7. BNP voter
    October 25, 2009 at 7:46 pm

    I dont consider the BNP as a threat at all when you consider what the big 3 especially Labour have already done to this country.
    Now I heard all the smears againt the BNP but few of them if any can be proven and even if they could be proven, whats the big deal when you consider that this country Is already being pulled into the gutter fast enough by the mainstream parties.
    The worst possible thing that could happen if the BNP got in is that they might not be any better than the rest of the others but it is almost impossible even for a vandal to do worse than the big 3.
    As long as they just get rid of all the liberal marxist antihuman nonsense and I am not competing with people from third world countries just in order to work and get a roof over my head, I quite frankly couldnt care less about all these undeserving minoritys, I mean after all if native brits cant live in their own country properly then why should other people for crying out loud!!!

    I actually like the national front better as it makes no bones about it policies as they have openly said that they want to use repatratriation which i myself dont see any alternative to unless you seriously think genocide is a reasonable option

  1. May 27, 2009 at 6:09 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 126 other followers

%d bloggers like this: