Home > Law > Childcare row prediction

Childcare row prediction

_44540205_logo226It’s 10am on Monday morning, and I thought I should just take a couple of minutes away from spreadsheeting to predict the kind of outraged fury that will spread across the rightwing blogosphere and media today, as the story about two police officers being told they can’t share childcare gather momentum.  It’s already on the BBC website news headlines.

My predictions are for headlines/commentary including ‘nanny state gone mad’, ‘Labour invasion of homes’ blah blah blah.  You know the kind of thing.

The key message will be that this is the fault of the Labour government and its ridiculous lawmaking, with the fact that no-one picked up the possible ramification of the wording of the Childcare Act, as it passed through parliament, quietly ignored. 

There will be little or no mention of the fact that the Children’s Minister has got straight on the case and ordered a review of the particular case.

The rightwing press /blogosphere will not let any inconvenient facts get in the way, that’s for sure, but it’s worth setting out briefly what is REALLY going on here.

Essentially, Ofsted officers, in an agency (the childcare part of Ofsted) that was set up primarily to issue strict guidelines and ensure that they are enforced, have pushed their desire to see guidelines adhered to strictly just a bit too far, and are interpreting the Act in the way it was never intended to be interpreted. 

That’s the whole culture of the childcare part of Ofsted, and lack of flexibility/strict interpretation is actually what it’s there for, whether we like it or not. 

I run an after school club as part of a wider childcare business, and we often have less than eight children in because of the small school roll and other activities going on.   The childcare ratio is set at 1 to 8, but I still have to employ two staff because the rules say that’s the minimum, even though there are teaching staff about 10 yards away.

Yes, that grates sometimes because I have to cross subsidise this essential extended schools services from the surplus on the nursery provision (though I’m also happy to employ an extra person).  But I accept it, because I know Ofsted simply can’t just say to me ‘oh well, that’s a bit different so we’ll let you off with one staff member.’

If you’re going to have regulation like this, it’s got to be tight and it’s got to be tightly enforced. 

The alternative – which I’d be more than open to personally – is to more or less do away with such regulation, and you know what the rightwing blogs would say the first time there was a serious incident….’Labour’s let down our children’,’the government’s got to act’ and so forth.

Of course this interpretation by Ofsted in one case is over the top, though by making it they force it to the top of the agenda and make sure the interpretation of the Act is clarified, exactly as is now being done under the review ordered. 

In a nutshell, the system’s necessarily strict, but it’s working in the way everyone said it should, right down to the necessary clarification of the single word ‘reward’.

But such a stance won’t sell the Daily Mail, or keep Dale’s trolls happy.  You look and see.

About these ads
Categories: Law
  1. September 29, 2009 at 12:39 am

    Aah, here we go. Thought I’d better ceck the predictions:

    A ‘Silent Hunter’ at Harry’s Place:
    ‘In fact, right up to the moment when New Labour assumed power; then we changed into a repressive, authoritarian, Nanny knows best, neo Nazi state.’

    And her/his I(I’m guessing his) trollfriend ‘Tory': ‘One wonders how much damage the government scummers can do before they get thrown out.’

    And ‘Venichka': ‘The main thing that prevents this odious regime from implementing its totalitarian fantasies to the degree that they would like to, and given a further term of office, would get substantially closer to doing, (and imagine how much were they would be were Harriet Harman to be in charge!) is that not only is a regime of amoral interfering self-righteous busybodies, it is a regime of INCOMPETENT amoral interfering self-righteous busybodies.’

    And here’s the wise ‘Plato Says':

    Thanks to Labour, two parents that share child care arrangements whilst they go to work have been ticked off…
    ….The rules, which officials insist are vital to safeguard children, were set out in Labour’s Childcare Act 2006 and, in a little-noticed move, regulations were adopted two years later.’

    And Uncle bob commenting: ‘It just beggars belief sometimes. No wonder the country has gone to pot.’

    I’m sure it goes on and on, but I’ve had enough now.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 124 other followers

%d bloggers like this: