<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Regurgitation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/12/11/regurgitation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/12/11/regurgitation/</link>
	<description>&#34;We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run down&#34; - Aneurin Bevan, 1953</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 18:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/12/11/regurgitation/#comment-3960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=1687#comment-3960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, been away.

Not sure that any of what&#039;s set out above stands in the way of it having been a perceptive article, back in 1979, about the discursive articulation by Thatcherism of new right economics and old Tory &#039;family values etc&#039;..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, been away.</p>
<p>Not sure that any of what&#8217;s set out above stands in the way of it having been a perceptive article, back in 1979, about the discursive articulation by Thatcherism of new right economics and old Tory &#8216;family values etc&#8217;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/12/11/regurgitation/#comment-3946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vinny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=1687#comment-3946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was indeed Stuart Hall who propounded &#039;authoritarian populism&#039; amongst much other dross.

And who is this looking at Stuart Hall &amp; Thatcherism in 1989? Why, it&#039;s no other than Gordon Brown....

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v11/n03/gordon-brown/thatcherism]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was indeed Stuart Hall who propounded &#8216;authoritarian populism&#8217; amongst much other dross.</p>
<p>And who is this looking at Stuart Hall &amp; Thatcherism in 1989? Why, it&#8217;s no other than Gordon Brown&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v11/n03/gordon-brown/thatcherism" rel="nofollow">http://www.lrb.co.uk/v11/n03/gordon-brown/thatcherism</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Semple</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/12/11/regurgitation/#comment-3934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Semple]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=1687#comment-3934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would actually say that the Eurocommunist wing of the CP was indeed one of the ideological antecedents of Blairism. It&#039;s no accident either that Blair himself contributed to Marxism Today.

As for Stuart Hall, wasn&#039;t he one of those propounding that &quot;authoritarian populism&quot; guff?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would actually say that the Eurocommunist wing of the CP was indeed one of the ideological antecedents of Blairism. It&#8217;s no accident either that Blair himself contributed to Marxism Today.</p>
<p>As for Stuart Hall, wasn&#8217;t he one of those propounding that &#8220;authoritarian populism&#8221; guff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/12/11/regurgitation/#comment-3933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vinny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=1687#comment-3933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d be wary of lauding Stuart Hall. He was one of the guiding lights of &#039;Marxism Today&#039; in the &#039;80s, a magazine with very little Marxism in it but quite a lot of admiration for Thatcherism, a view partly based on Hall&#039;s interpretation of Thatcherism. 

As was noted over ten years ago:

&quot;Almost every fundamental of new Labour can be found in the pages of Marxism Today&#039;s back issues. Rights and responsibilities, community and citizenship, love of modernisation, they were all there, dressed up rather unconvincingly as a &#039;progressive&#039; take on Marxism&quot;

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,,324997,00.html

It would be too much to describe MT as the father of New Labour and Blairism, but it could be easily described as an influential uncle and Hall had quite a say in this.

It&#039;s no coincidence MT contributor Geoff Mulgan was Director of Policy at 10 Downing Street under Tony Blair, and that MT editor Martin Jacques, after the mag&#039;s demise, openly expressed his admiration for Thatcher and revealed he thought the CPGB was unreformable in the &#039;80s, but stayed in because he needed its subsidy to continue publishing Marxism Today. In addition Nina Temple, a close ally of Jacques and the last General Secretary of the CPGB, now works as head of Development and Communications at the right wing, think-tank the Social Market Foundation.

Of the two Stuart Hall&#039;s give me the TV &amp; radio presenter (and fellow Man City fan) anyday of the week.

(BTW I&#039;m not a communist, or even a Marxist but I was one for some years in the &#039;80s.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be wary of lauding Stuart Hall. He was one of the guiding lights of &#8216;Marxism Today&#8217; in the &#8217;80s, a magazine with very little Marxism in it but quite a lot of admiration for Thatcherism, a view partly based on Hall&#8217;s interpretation of Thatcherism. </p>
<p>As was noted over ten years ago:</p>
<p>&#8220;Almost every fundamental of new Labour can be found in the pages of Marxism Today&#8217;s back issues. Rights and responsibilities, community and citizenship, love of modernisation, they were all there, dressed up rather unconvincingly as a &#8216;progressive&#8217; take on Marxism&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0</a>,,324997,00.html</p>
<p>It would be too much to describe MT as the father of New Labour and Blairism, but it could be easily described as an influential uncle and Hall had quite a say in this.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no coincidence MT contributor Geoff Mulgan was Director of Policy at 10 Downing Street under Tony Blair, and that MT editor Martin Jacques, after the mag&#8217;s demise, openly expressed his admiration for Thatcher and revealed he thought the CPGB was unreformable in the &#8217;80s, but stayed in because he needed its subsidy to continue publishing Marxism Today. In addition Nina Temple, a close ally of Jacques and the last General Secretary of the CPGB, now works as head of Development and Communications at the right wing, think-tank the Social Market Foundation.</p>
<p>Of the two Stuart Hall&#8217;s give me the TV &amp; radio presenter (and fellow Man City fan) anyday of the week.</p>
<p>(BTW I&#8217;m not a communist, or even a Marxist but I was one for some years in the &#8217;80s.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftoutside</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/12/11/regurgitation/#comment-3931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leftoutside]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=1687#comment-3931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to be honest the post you link to next about your Dad and the BNP is truly inspirational, it comes across as something very personal but also very politcal so I think you&#039;d be foolish to not include that.

I&#039;m trying to work out what I&#039;ll submit, any recommendations would be welcome. I hope you don&#039;t intend to win too much, because my grandma&#039;s alive &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; keeps the Readers&#039; Digest! I&#039;ve a lot of leverage...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to be honest the post you link to next about your Dad and the BNP is truly inspirational, it comes across as something very personal but also very politcal so I think you&#8217;d be foolish to not include that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to work out what I&#8217;ll submit, any recommendations would be welcome. I hope you don&#8217;t intend to win too much, because my grandma&#8217;s alive <em>and</em> keeps the Readers&#8217; Digest! I&#8217;ve a lot of leverage&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Conspiracy &#187; Tory economic attacks keep missing target</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2009/12/11/regurgitation/#comment-3930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liberal Conspiracy &#187; Tory economic attacks keep missing target]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=1687#comment-3930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to ask why his predictions didn&#8217;t pan out? Me neither.  The nearest we have so far (via Paul) is the BBC&#8217;s Stephanie Flanders tentatively saying:  The Conservatives would rather the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to ask why his predictions didn&#8217;t pan out? Me neither.  The nearest we have so far (via Paul) is the BBC&#8217;s Stephanie Flanders tentatively saying:  The Conservatives would rather the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

