<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 40 Labour MPs voice dissent at cuts and privatisation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2010/02/01/labour-mps-voice-dissent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2010/02/01/labour-mps-voice-dissent/</link>
	<description>&#34;We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run down&#34; - Aneurin Bevan, 1953</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:40:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whither Labour and what alternative? &#171; Though Cowards Flinch</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2010/02/01/labour-mps-voice-dissent/#comment-5090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whither Labour and what alternative? &#171; Though Cowards Flinch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=2111#comment-5090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] evident, however, is the desire of many Labour Party members to oppose their leaders. There are several dozen MPs who signed the EDM demanding a TU Freedom Bill, who&#8217;ve opposed privatisations, illiberal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] evident, however, is the desire of many Labour Party members to oppose their leaders. There are several dozen MPs who signed the EDM demanding a TU Freedom Bill, who&#8217;ve opposed privatisations, illiberal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2010/02/01/labour-mps-voice-dissent/#comment-4808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/?p=2111#comment-4808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much more interesting than the press release with signatures itself would be a description of the process whereby it was produced.  In an ideal world it would have come about because the various CLPs/sponsoring trade unionists came together to require this this document be signed of by their representatives in paliament.  Of course, it&#039;s almost certainly something that emanates from the Compass PR department (well Compass IS a PR department).  

Having said that, I still think it&#039;s welcome enough to know that a reasonably sized  group of MPs have been influenced enough by clear shifts in public opinion about what it is &#039;acceptable&#039; to sign up to.  That doesn&#039;t alter the process we need to get to, a part of which is to (re)develop a &#039;culture&#039; within Labour about Labour MPs being our delegates to parliament rather than our leaders in parliament, but it does suggest it&#039;s all a bit more feasible than it might have been a couple of years ago to develop, in some places, the kind of relationships you set out above.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much more interesting than the press release with signatures itself would be a description of the process whereby it was produced.  In an ideal world it would have come about because the various CLPs/sponsoring trade unionists came together to require this this document be signed of by their representatives in paliament.  Of course, it&#8217;s almost certainly something that emanates from the Compass PR department (well Compass IS a PR department).  </p>
<p>Having said that, I still think it&#8217;s welcome enough to know that a reasonably sized  group of MPs have been influenced enough by clear shifts in public opinion about what it is &#8216;acceptable&#8217; to sign up to.  That doesn&#8217;t alter the process we need to get to, a part of which is to (re)develop a &#8216;culture&#8217; within Labour about Labour MPs being our delegates to parliament rather than our leaders in parliament, but it does suggest it&#8217;s all a bit more feasible than it might have been a couple of years ago to develop, in some places, the kind of relationships you set out above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

