Nick Cohen’s half empty glass
The accounts I’ve read of the Westminster Skeptics discussion earlier this week about the effectiveness, or otherwise, of political blogging have given the evening’s first speaker, Nick Cohen, fairly short shrift.
He doesn’t seem very popular. Certainly, Sunny’s pretty dismissive.
But I wonder if there was more in what he was trying to say than was appreciated by a crowd largely interested in the development of high-profile, nationally focused blogs.
This is what Dave Cole reports Cohen as saying (I assume paraphrased):
Blogs aren’t doing reporting or investigation, but duplicating the work of the mainstream media; there’s lots of blogging on PMQs but very little on select committees or the Lords. Equally, there is no coverage of England outside of London. He recalled something Alan Rusbridger had said – for the first time since the Enlightenment, we might see major cities without their own newspaper scrutinising what’s going on in the city and that this have never been tried in Europe before.
Mmm. Certainly a pretty down beat assessment. He certainly seems a pretty ‘glass half empty’ kind of bloke.
I happen to be a blogger living outside London, and know quite a few good blogs that cover events outside of London. I also know how to develop small/medium scale social enterprises, something I suspect Nick’s never done. Here’s my own ’glass half full’ assessment from last half month:
We need a method for blog development which takes into account the different strengths of existing local and regional media across the country so that impact is maximised. For example, in Liverpool, where the Echo retains a per capita readership and ‘opinion dominance’ far above many other cities of the same size or bigger (cf. the fading Manchester Evening News), there will be a case for influencing and feeding that paper, whereas in other places blogs should simply seek to fill a political comment vacuum.
Just like Nick’s, my assessment, and outline plan for the development of newspaper/blog/activism ’social businesses’ got pretty short shrift at the time from people who think they know what a blog looks like and what it will always, always look like.
But maybe it’s not me and Nick that are wrong. Maybe it’s everyone else who is behind the curve.
Me and Nick Cohen. Bosom bodies. Who’d have thought it? We can go out for a pint with our other new best mate.
Heh!
Sunny
I’m sorry, I can’t agree with you there.
Paul,
Another point to make: Nick Cohen is talking out of his arse if he thinks journalists still cover select committee debates.
Maybe in the 1970s. Not anymore.
Political correspondents in westminster are a dying breed. When I worked there it was a fricking joke. Christ, part of my job was to go on hansard, copy and paste the things my MP had said, and then email it to lazy journalists in a snazzed-up press release that they’d pay attention to.
Otherwise, nothing.
Now, I was conscientious and my MP a thoroughly descent bloke. But if we’d been, say, Tories, we could have told the press anything we bollocking well liked and they’d have swallowed it.
fucking hell why can’t i spell “decent” properly this week. That’s about the 5th time.
You’re just looking for an argument aren’t you? Paul? eh? Bloody socialists – always looking for a fight…
Paul S
I think he’s agreeing with you that journos don’t go to select committees or take any notice of them any more.
Not only do I cover “outside of London” I do events “outside of Britain.”
Yeah but the growth of international socialism has its limits, Hadleigh. It can’t go to France. Be sensible.
Not much of a paraphrase, to be honest.
I think I agree with Cohen on newspapers, but he’s flat wrong on blogs; firstly, it’s a developing medium and secondly he just ignores inconvenient facts.
How do you think it will develop Dave? I mean the quantity of blogs and blog readers has been increasing, slowly, but it can’t go on indefinitely – and the internet is not universally available in any case.
I honestly don’t know, Dave, but I go back to the argument I made in my post – there’s no such thing as blogging. I don’t think blogging will develop in any one way. I’m increasingly of the opinion that blogging was done a disservice by its first ‘star’ being Paul Staines, leading to lots of people starting to blog on politics thinking that gossip, rumour and willy-waving were the way to do it. Hopefully, people will grow out of that a bit.