Home > General Politics > Chavez, anti-Zionism, and antisemitism

Chavez, anti-Zionism, and antisemitism

Henrique Capriles Radonski’s popularity in Venezuela is a cause of concern for Hugo Chavez, now trying to hang on to his credentials while the Latin American country restricts electricity use for the second year running, suffers double digit inflation and increasing crime.

Radonski has put his name down as the candidate running for the Table of Democratic Unity (MUD), an alliance of conservative parties, and since doing so has seen his approval ratings shoot up in opinion polls, while Chavez’ approval drops.

The MUD candidate has vowed to adopt similar rhetoric to Chavez, particularly concerning programmes and welfare for the poor, but Chavez’ leading party, and the state owned media, will run a hot campaign against the Governor of Miranda, citing his alleged involvement and complicity in a siege of the Cuban embassy during the 2002 failed coup, an accusation the opposition candidate denies.

Another thing that Radonski himself has picked upon is references to his ancestry. While he identifies strongly as Catholic, his Mother was Jewish, and his great-grandparents were killed in a concentration camp. According to the candidate in an interview with the Jewish Telegraph Agency, when the campaign for the 2012 presidency begins properly it is likely his Jewish background will appear as a focal point to undermine him.

He says this with some certainty because during the 2008 mayoral elections he was described by state media as a member of the “Jewish Zionist Bourgeoisie” and “genetically fascist”.

As an aside note, there is contention surrounding whether the term Jewish Zionist Bourgeoisie is one of antisemitism (the latter term clearly steps way beyond that mark). Lenni Brenner, American Marxist and supporter of the group “Jews Against Zionism”, in his book “Zionism in the Age of Dictators” (1983) once said:

What separates the Jewish Zionist bourgeoisie from the non-Zionist members of the same class is really only the fact that the Zionists are clearly aware that they can attain their interest as a class only in the domain of a unified people and no longer as mere individuals

Separating this paragraph from anything else he might have said before, what we see referred to here is a comment on capitalism, and though race is obviously referred to, the subject still rests upon national class relations.

How this aside is relevant to Chavez is the way he has dealt with Judaism and Zionism before. Whenever Chavez has been accused of being antisemitic in the past he has always quipped back that he is simply anti-Zionist, and that, like with the words of Brenner, even when he refers to Jewish Zionism, this isn’t a crack at Jews per se, but Zionists, and to a greater extent, US and Israeli imperialism.

But at the very least Chavez has failed, quite significantly, to address Venezuelan antisemitism (under his watch Venezuelan antisemitism and attacks on Jews have risen significantly) and curb unpalatable rhetoric from state television. Only recently did state-run radio broadcast a reading of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, during which the journalist reading Cristina Gonzalez expressed:

her admiration for the Jewish community and “non-Zionist” Israelis before plucking what she called “little pearls” from the book to explain to listeners why Zionists have been able to amass a concentration of power and wealth.

This is not the first time either. In 2008 on the same station, it was broadcast that:

Hitler’s partners were Jews…like the Rockefellers, who were Jews [Editors' note: The Rockefellers are not Jews]. These were not the Jews murdered in the concentration camps. [Those killed] were working-class Jews, Communist Jews, poor Jews, because the rich Jews were the ones behind the plan to occupy Palestine.

While in 2010 the pro-Chavez website Aporrea noted that the true essence of Judaism cannot be found in the Torah, “but in the realities of capitalism”.

There are other examples of concern, such as Chavez’ former adviser and confidante Norberto Ceresole who was a known holocaust denier, and his uncritical relationship with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, but they are too numerous to list.

The battle for the 2012 elections will prove to be fierce, but it’s anyone’s guess how Chavez will organise against a conservative candidate with Jewish ancestry, given the unsavory territory state television will explore, leaving a very fine line between anti-Zionism and antisemitism proper.

Advertisement
  1. skidmarx
    June 13, 2011 at 2:29 pm | #1

    Chavez’ leading party, and the state owned media, will run a hot campaign
    Well, a disproportionate number of Miss Worlds have come from Venezuela. More seriously, I think you’ve got this well, but not perfectly translated from somewhere ( “during which the journalist reading Cristina Gonzalez expressed:” isn’t great) .
    The Protocols story is a bit nasty, though the sources seem a little “hearsay”. Even without trying to translate, Aporrea seems as nasty as suggested, but does it reflect the opinion of Chavez?

    “The MUD candidate has vowed to adopt similar rhetoric to Chavez” seems an odd way to advertise a candidate. And making an issue out of possible anti-semitic attacks when the strongest evidence you have is the target worrying it might happen falls into the category of scare-mongering rather than news.

    • June 13, 2011 at 2:47 pm | #2

      I’ll address your 4 points, while leaving out your point about Miss World’s (in case I put my foot in it by saying Venezuela is known as “boob job capital of the world” and attempt to forge a link between the two):

      1 – Sources seem a little hearsay

      What don’t you like about the sources? Let’s say they’ve bent the truth slightly on what Gonzalez said about the protocols, even reading them out on a broadcast is ridiculous; further, giving them authority like this, in a country that has rife antisemitism, uncontrollable too, seems a tad thoughtless.

      2 – On Aporrea

      The website belongs to Gonzalo Gómez, an active member of the governing party, PSUV; so why didn’t Chavez say anything? Further, and as ModernityBlog wrote about, Chavez quoted from the website on numerous occasions, which means the site has his seal of approval.

      3 – The way in which I advertise the candidate

      That’s how he addresses himself – see the first paragraph here

      4 – Evidence of possible attacks

      Of course state TV might not focus on his background (although if he is to be believed they already are referring to him as Jewish), but history tells us they are more than capable of it.

  2. skidmarx
    June 13, 2011 at 3:17 pm | #3

    1. I did a search for Cristina Gonzalez and The Protocols, and the only results I got referred back to the same two reports attacking her. So we only see one side. O, you say, but even if that one side is a little bit right, she’s still pretty bad; maybe, but still not an impressive way to construct an argument.

    2. Just because someone quotes from a website, doesn’t mean they approve or know of everything else said there or linked to. I realise that making people responsible for what others say is normal in Leagues of Decency,but it’s still a bit weak for my liking.

    3. He gets a slightly different write-up here.

    4. Then if it happens, that will be news, now it is scare-mongering.

    No apostrophe need appear in “Miss Worlds”.

  3. skidmarx
    June 13, 2011 at 4:18 pm | #6

    Sorry about the missing html marker after 3.

    1. You still don’t make a strong case out of hearsay.

    2.Still a bit weak.

    3.Given the state department’s complicity in the coup against Chavez, they’re not exactly the most impartial source.

    4. Again, the source for the allegations of attacks are only the alleged target. Not the most impartial of sources. [and the JTA is the same source as for the Gomzalez story. Not surprisingly for two stories concerning anti-semitism, but it would take more than one journalist with an agenda to make some of this up, and there seems to have been plenty of that in Venezuela]

    What seems to be true is that the conservative policy of “Feck the Poor” hasn’t managed to shift Chavez, and that a more sophisticated strategy is needed. But I don’t think that trying to make Chavez out to be a new Hitler is it. Bonapartist perhaps, but the other is a hyperbole none of those in Venezuela who didn’t benefit from the pre-Chavez regime would buy into. As far as I can tell from my limited knowledge.

    • June 13, 2011 at 4:54 pm | #7

      1. The case is if the broadcast happened then it is just one in a number of examples where antisemitic sentiment has been used to justify anti-Zionism. The burden to prove it didn’t happen is with you, since there is already a wealth of news items suggesting it did happen, I’ve no reason to disbelieve them, and nobody has come out saying it’s all a pile of bull yet.

      2. Okay, take this as an example. ConservativeHome is not affiliated to the Conservative Party, it is an independent, grassroots blog. Let’s say they made a big deal over Israel, started rattling on about Jewish people, then used the protocols to justify their beliefs that Jewish people are genetically inclined to see gentiles as cattle whose only purpose is to toil Israeli fields. First of all you’d hear about it. If the articles had come from someone who is a member of the Conservative Party, you could expect David Cameron to get rid of them or at the very least condemn him/her. You would not expect David Cameron to quote from ConservativeHome or ignore the issue altogether. This is the equivalent right here.

      3. Evidence of his involvement was weak, and in Venezuela you can’t stand if you have been a convicted criminal – this is uncontested apart from by Chavez. The US may well have a vendetta against him, being involved, as they were, in the coup attempt, but even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

      4. The sources are from Jewish interest websites, does this really affect their partiality in a debilitating way?Chavez, I don’t believe is the new Hitler, some of his friends maybe…

  4. June 13, 2011 at 4:43 pm | #8

    Excellent article, though leftyy depressing. In the past, Chavez has “demamded” that the Jewish community.ity condemn Israel, as thouhj they have a special responsibility to respond to the actions of their fairly distant co-religionists. It does piss me off that much of the anti zionist movement, with whom I have happily marched – find it so difficult to acknowledge that the term ‘zionist’ is ever used euphemistically, that it is not always deployed an ethnically neutral deliniator for people who jappen to share a particular political position. At the end of the day it isn’t just Israel supporters who blur the boundaries between anti-semitism, and some people need to stop decrying all criticism as an attempt to shut down debate.

    • June 13, 2011 at 5:19 pm | #9

      Precisely right Reuben. It’s interesting what is at play here though. Venezuelan state radio has broadcast a reading of the protocols as a way of drumming up anti-capitalist, as well as anti-Zionist, support. It’s as though the message is: Protocol 15 – Gentiles are cattle; and there you have it as proof, Judaism is inextricably linked to capitalism.

      ****

      In October 2010 a controversial rabbi, Ovadia Yosef, said: “Why are Gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat.” To anyone sensible, Rabbi Yosef is an idiot. But for someone who uses the protocols to make a point about the exploitation inherent to capitalism, they might say this is typical of the Jewish Bourgeoisie. Use of the word Jewish here is superfluous.

  5. June 13, 2011 at 7:12 pm | #10

    Good blog, though I have one minor criticism. You repeat the claim often cited by defenders of Chavez that his principle opposition- the Coalition for Democratic Unity- is “an alliance of conservative parties”. This rather undermines opposition to him from left-wingers, because it isn’t actually the case.

    MUD includes: Project Venezuela (Christian Democrats), A New Era (Third Way Centrists), Justice First (Liberal Humanists), PODEMOS (Social Democrats), Red Flag Party (Marxist-Leninists), Radical Cause (Socialists), Movement for Socialism (Social Democrats), Copei (Christian Democrats) and Democratic Action (Centrists).

    The opposition, as far as I can tell, is to the dictatorial nature of the Chavez regime- not the economic or even foreign policy. Many on the Left choose to defend Chavez because they fear right-wingers regaining control in Latin America- ultimately, MUD is a broad coalition that includes people far more left-wing than Hugo Chavez.

    • June 13, 2011 at 8:21 pm | #11

      You’re right and I should have made more light of that. MUD is led by Luis Ignacio Planas, President of Copei, which as a centrist Christian Democrat party draws it more towards the right than many other parties operational in Venezuela – but the notion that it’s a conservative grouping is unfounded. Radonski formerly stood for Copei as well, and will represent MUD in the presidential elections, so it has Christian Democrat leadership, but I certainly wouldn’t want to push the Chavista myth that MUD is straight up conservative. Cheers Dan.

  6. June 14, 2011 at 1:51 am | #12

    The interesting thing here is the attempt to recreate the AD/COPEI grand coalition in an FPTP system. Good luck with that.

    • June 14, 2011 at 2:39 am | #13

      haha, would it be because anything proportional would require candidates to remove their limbs in certain cases?

  7. June 14, 2011 at 8:54 pm | #14

    Venezuela used to be PR before Chavez, but everyone grew to hate the AD/COPEI grand coalition. Chavez was able to channel this to switch to FPTP, splintering opposition to MVR into tiny fragments.

    • June 14, 2011 at 10:28 pm | #15

      the toe rag didn’t test out AV? I suppose none of this matters when he tries to indefinitely elected again, although a tip for him should be to do it when he’s a little more popular, which with the way things are going is never, so he better hurry up

  1. June 13, 2011 at 3:13 pm | #1
  2. June 13, 2011 at 11:42 pm | #2

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,220 other followers