Home > General Politics > Have the banks been providing false data to the Bank of England?

Have the banks been providing false data to the Bank of England?

In the light of the newly released Quarter 3 Project Merlin figures, both the Guardian and the Daily Telegraph have finally picked up on the growing Project Merlin scandal,which we brought to attention last week.  The Telegraph now says:

The latest quarter’s £57.4bn brings the total up to almost £158bn, including £56.1bn to SMEs.

Drill into the figures, however, and a totally different picture emerges – and one highlighted by none other than the Bank of England. Strip out gross lending from simply rolling over existing credit facilities and, hey presto, the total nine-month figure drops to just £77.3bn. Then, net that off against the money coming in the other direction as companies repay their loans and the figures are minus £2.8bn in the first quarter, minus £4.3bn in the second, and a positive of just £400m in the third…

Even on the banks’ suspect figures, gross lending to smaller companies actually contracted by £1.7bn in the latest quarter. As Citigroup economists point out, the latest data also shows small companies paying almost 2.4 percentage points more than the going rate of interest for their credit, with the spread widening.

As becomes clearer by the day, Merlin was a PR trick – and a schizophrenic one at that.

This awakening by the mainstream media is good news, although the BBC haven’t yet caught up.  Radio 5 yesterday (from 1hr 30mins 3o secs) featured an entirely unopposed interview with a Lloyd’s Banking Group representative, in which the interviewer failed to refer either to the fall in net lending or to the Bank of England’s Trends in Lending data, which show a downward lending trend overall.  This is despite the BBC’s own business reporter Robert Peston having picked up on some of the problems back in July.

Even better news, though, is that Labour has woken up to the growing scandal, with Lord Myners  mirroring TCF’s investigations very closely in his Lords question:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether data reported in the most recent Bank of England report Trends in Lending have contributed to their assessment of Project Merlin’s performance.

This is the nub of the matter.  Revealingly, Tory respondent Lord Sassoon did not reply to the specific question’s focus on the Trends in Lending data, either entirely missing or ignoring the point of the question.

We are, then, approaching the point at which Ed Miliband will be able to stand up at PMQs and ask Cameron why he misled the House in his original response on 2nd November.

And if that were all there were to it, then TCF’s job would be done.  But there’s more, and I suspect it’s more serious for the banks.

Consider this comment from an SME owner under the Telegraph article, referring to a point before Merlin:

Merlin always was a con trick. We had funding of c. 400,000.00 with RBS “renewed” in January 2011. The three accounts involved were closed and re-opened with new account numbers – hey presto : 440k new lending!
Now this is by no means the only such comment I have seen on the message boards, and while it may anecdotal at the moment, the Federation of Small Businesses seems to agree that the banks are up to something:
The FSB also criticised the practice of some banks of calling in business loans, renewing them, and calling them “new lending”.
The big question, though, is why the banks would need to massage their figures in this way?  After all, as we pointed out previously, the banks already managed to get lending rollover figures included in the Project Merlin agreement.  That’s exactly the principal reason why the lending figures in the Project Merlin reports are near double those provided in the Bank of England’s established Trends in Lending reports, which follow the Bank’s Statistical Code of Practice (the Merlin figures do not) and which explicitly excludes rollover lending.
 
So if they don’t need to manipulate the data for Project Merlin, the conclusion has to be that they are manipulating it with Trends in Lending in mind, providing bogus new lending figures that will pass under the Bank of England’s Statistical Code radar.
 
This is a much more serious matter, and moves us from PR stunt territory into something that may be close to criminal activity.
 
Consider this.  One of the material considerations in the Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee’s monthly meeting on interest rates is how much well credit is moving in the economy.  At the moment, the MPC is keeping rates low because, on balance, they think keeping the economy going is more important than inflation, with the effect that has on savings, pensions and general day-to-day living. 
 
Fair enough, but what if they were to judge that low interest rates weren’t keeping credit moving anyway, and the banks were (as we’ve seen above) the banks were punishing small businesses with their own high interest rates anyway?  In such circumstances, it’s at least feasible that the MPC would raise interest rates, while looking at other measures to get the economy moving (or holding up their hands to government and saying they can do no more with monetary instruments).
 
If it does turn out that the banks are providing the BoE with what is effectively false data, therefore, it would be quite reasonable to accuse them of deliberately skewing the MPC’s decision-making process for their own benefit.
 
Would that be illegal practice by the banks, as well as just immoral?  Well, I don’t know, but I’d certainly like to find out.
 
Finally, see also this useful post covering some of the same ground (h/t Garry), but also pointing out that new ways of SME financing are emerging which largely bypass the main banks. 
 
Given that the Vickers report on banking reform implictly recognises that the banks will not take their core lending function seriously anytime soon, along with the possible US-led move of consumer banking away from banks and towards Credit Unions, then this may be more important in the longer term than which bankers go to jail, though considerably less entertaining.
 

 

 

 

Categories: General Politics
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,329 other followers