The 49% myth and the death of the NHS
I’ll admit to being a bit nonplussed by today’s media coverage over the Health and Social Care bill, and the ensuing twitterstorm.
The BBC, for example, announces:
NHS hospitals in England will be free to use almost half their hospital beds and theatre time for private patients under government plans.
A recent revision to the ongoing health bill will allow foundation hospitals to raise 49% of funds through non-NHS work if the bill gets through Parliament.
Yet the removal of the cap on private income was in the bill as it was set out in its first reading to the Commons on 19th January 2011. Clause 150 in that original version announces the end of the caps put in place by Labour:
In section 44 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (private health care), omit—
(a) subsection (1) (restriction on provision of private health services) (b) subsection (2) (cap on private income)…..
The NHS foundation trust does not fulfil its principal purpose unless, in each financial year, its total income from the provision of goods and services for the purposes of the health service in England is greater than its total income from the provision of goods and services for any other purposes.
There are a couple of point to be made on this amendment.
First, it is concerned with resolving concerns about whether the total lifting of the cap would open the NHS up to EU competition law. It has nothing to do with any the core principle about the nature of the NHS.
Second, the BBC is quite wrong to peddle the idea that to use “almost half their hospital beds and theatre time for private patients under government plans.” The amendment refers to income totals, not to bed or theatre time.
It is quite conceivable, therefore, that in fairly short order most beds/theatre time will be taken up by private patients, given that private providers will cherrypick the ‘straightforward’ patients from whom they can extract maximum profit, while leaving the more difficult, less lucrative treatment and care to be picked up by the public purse.
This is evidenced quite clearly in the Lord debate. During the debate Shirley Williams argues for a strengthening of the amendment:
In my view, it would be very helpful if there were “belt and braces”, by which I mean a government amendment which would indicate that, in the case of foundation trusts, the majority of patients should be NHS patients. That is, there should be an unquestionable commitment to having a majority of NHS patients…..It is helpful in this complicated Bill to have some islands of clarity that those who are not experts in the field-again, I include myself-can understand. People could understand the simple concept that a majority of patients should be from the NHS, not the private sector.
Tory minister Earl Howe rejects this proposal:
I cannot agree with her [Williams']… arguments that support the need for an amendment. First, we do not agree that legislation should be used symbolically in this way. Foundation trusts’ principal purpose already covers the point that she raised. Secondly, even if we had such an amendment, it would not make any difference to how the courts interpret and apply EU competition law.
From this exchange it seems quite clear that the government envisages hospitals in which many more than 50% of all patients are private (thus opening up a future narrative for the near future that the NHS-funded minority are scroungers).
Overall, I stick with my initial view, set out in March 2010 when I’d seen the initial bill, that the NHS as we know it is effectively dead. I don’t see major industrial unrest stopping it in its tracks at this stage, and many of the crucial parts of the NHS infrastructure has already been dismantled or will soon be beyond repair.
While of course the left should be doing what it can in the way of rearguard resistance, we should be wary of dilettantism (h/t Leon Trotsky, 1929), and focus on battles that we can win (more around commissioning than around provider services).
Instead to be looking at what a future Labour government should be committing itself to in the form of NHS II, without fetishing NHS I (which has had plenty of faults) and I’ll be writing a lot about that in the near future.
- I'm fine with the idea of working til 70 so long as my job is manning the sniper tower above whatever Gulag has all the Tories in it. 20 hours ago
- @ScottishPleb You talk of these things of right and left wing like they're processes beyond control. You'll learn. 1 day ago
- @antoniabance @createstreets Would love to see this approach to housing need in Skem, where huge amounts of Fordist-design space go to waste 9 hours ago
- I think they practice incoherent shouting on the playing fields of Eton, don't they? #as2013 They've practised hard, this lot. 16 hours ago
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.
- Involuntary voluntarism: pluralisms and the labour movement
- Adorno and Labour conference
- Is a Co-op Bank inquiry actually legal?
- So why did UKIP vote against saving £0.9bn on the Strasbourg-Brussels gravy train?
- Flag Day, updated
- Boot camps: some implementation considerations
- A note on the habitus of cycling safety
- Why is the left not outraged at plans to send nurses to prison?
- Letter to Merseyside Police about Knowsley Housing Trust
- Why are schools doing better in London?
|Left Outside on Is a Co-op Bank inquiry actual…|
|Metatone on Why is the left not outraged a…|
|Boffy on Is the Marxian labour theory o…|
|Paul Cockshott on Is the Marxian labour theory o…|
|Metatone on Why are schools doing better i…|
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007