Home > General Politics > Sometimes the “politically correct” have a point

Sometimes the “politically correct” have a point

I’ve never been one for politically correct utterances or sentiment. If it ever transpired that city councils really were trying to ban Christmas trees, and that these stories weren’t tabloid concoctions, I’d be out with my pitchfork just like everyone else. On the other hand, sometimes things labelled politically correct in order to evoke a knee-jerk negative reaction in the public do not deserve such a reaction.

For the moment, set aside suspicions that the following story has been exaggerated and distorted out of all recognition. Apparently CO18, the specialist operations unit in charge of security at airports, was handed a ban on wearing Union Jack badges purchased from the Royal British Legion. The newspapers have claimed that it was a result of someone protesting that they found the badges offensive.

A petition to the Prime Minister’s office has attracted a couple of thousand signatures and today the Daily Mail and various London freebies have announced that the ban has been scrapped: police officers will now be permitted to wear the badge, which costs £1 and is supposed to be in support of the British troops in Afghanistan and Iraq. Naturally the interwebz has been full of outraged citizens attacking political correctness gone mad.

Stop and think about the ban for a moment. If any of us – police or not – wore badges to work which proclaimed our personal political opinions, we’d be asked to remove them. As a teacher, if I wore a red flag lapel pin to school, I’d be hauled over hot coals. Why are the police any different? Let me explain my reasoning for the hard of understanding.

Firstly, is wearing a Union Flag lapel pin a political statement? It is, and this is maintained by all press mentions and the response of Commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson’s press office, “[T]he Met should be openly showing their support for British troops currently serving abroad. On this occasion it seems entirely appropriate that officers are able to show their support for these brave men and women.

There can be no doubt that wearing the small flag is a political statement. So, if I was a policeman and decided to wear a Stop the War badge, would that be permitted by the powers that be? It’s unlikely that they’d face a tabloid backlash, so I doubt it. Therefore support for the wearing of these badges is first and foremost hypocritical.

Secondly, are there grounds for complaint about the badge, even excusing the inherent hypocrisy?

I, and many others, do not support the troops in Afghanistan or Iraq. In fact I, like many others, would like to see an end to these wars as fast as possible, and an independent judicial investigation as to how much the military, government and intelligence services know and have known about various actions in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The whole conflict requires documentation and examination lest we should find out about similar instances to the use of white phosphorus as a weapon at Fallujah. In Afghanistan, some civilians are thought to have been killed and injured by US use of this incendiary material. British personnel complicit in similar actions should be arrested and tried for war crimes at the Hague.

But forget about the idea that our troops are not lilywhite and that a thorough investigation might see the arrest and prosecution of personnel all the way up the chain of command. There’s still something obscene about wearing a badge supporting British troops that are essentially paid to uphold Islamist oppression. In almost any other context, the Islamophobic press would be jumping all over such a violation of human rights – but it’s a different story when we’re essentially propping up the people responsible.

My point in this long-winded denunciation of the war, and the role of the British Army in it, is to outline that there’s good reason for people to object to shows of support for the troops on the part of the police, especially in a professional context. Just as people would object if the police wore anti-war badges. When war crimes and torture are at stake, we can’t glibly dismiss objections as political correctness gone mad.

(Appendix; this guy gets an award for most amusing and apposite inquiry on the matter).

Categories: General Politics
  1. Miller 2.0
    July 30, 2009 at 10:53 am

    “I, and many others, do not support the troops in Afghanistan or Iraq”

    I think it all depends what you mean by ‘support’. I don’t think supporting the welfare of troops implies support for the political decision to engage in conflict X or Y. Nor does not supporting the wars mean that we should allow troops to be issued with dodgy equipment, or to live in uninhabitable conditions at home or abroad.

    You’d probably agree with me on all of this? Interesting stuff to learn from Russia on it any way, having support in the army was crucial to the success of 1917. It’s also electorally crucial for the left. As well as being right as a matter of principle, bearing in mind what elected politicians ask them to sacrifice.

    I basically don’t think individual troops can be blamed for the conflicts into which they are sent. Armies are a symptom of our politics, not a cause. Full culpability should rest instead on the shoulders of those who take the political decisions.

    Your points about war crimes etc are of course completely sound. Those who commit war crimes should not be supported under any circumstances. In fact, we have a moral duty to root them out. I don’t think this is controversial.

  2. July 30, 2009 at 11:58 am

    I have no trouble with soldiers, per se. I am all for securing the welfare of the troops – just as I am all for securing the welfare of all workers. But what I will not countenance is standing under a banner of “Support Our Troops” while attached to it comes such nationalist paraphernalia as the Royal British Legion and the Daily Mail offer.

    “Support Our Troops” in this context is not to do with their welfare, or they’d be clamouring to bring the troops home, where, y’know, they’re not likely to be shot at or blown up by a roadside bomb.

  3. Andrew Baker
    August 1, 2009 at 10:43 am

    I agree.

    In any case one doesn’t need badges to show everything you believe or feel. If an individual officer chose quite legitimately not wear such a badge would this not create barriers and an overlay of others judgment.

  4. patrick o riordan
    August 7, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    Is it any wonder police officers despair.the teacher who made the previous comments has nailed his own colours to the mast very clearly.while my colleagues quite clearly are showing support for the country they work for.this tit is displaying the same liberal pc,anti police,anti army,anti monarchy stance that has turned this country into a huge cess pit with no values ,bottle or character.

  5. August 7, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    Of course I’ve nailed my colours to the mast. Why else write anything?

    I am anti-police; though I have multiple relatives in the force, I have no sympathy with an organisation that beats demonstrators or seeks ever more powers to be used against dissenters.

    I am anti-army, insofar as the army is used as a political weapon against innocent civilians in other countries.

    I am certainly anti-monarchy; what right does any unelected institution have to wield any degree of power or influence in this country?

    As for not having any values, you’ll notice that your comment has been posted on this website. Freedom of speech, of disagreement, of protest are my values, among others – and unlike the police force and various politicians I don’t seek to restrain them. What you really mean is, I don’t share your values – and I am thankful for that, since I have no desire to live in the 1950s.

  1. July 30, 2009 at 11:59 am
  2. August 19, 2009 at 8:53 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 145 other followers

%d bloggers like this: