Home > General Politics > Why I’ll be having a good ol’ royal wedding knees up

Why I’ll be having a good ol’ royal wedding knees up

I’ll be at a royal wedding celebration on Friday.  I’ve been invited to one up the road, and I’m already saving up for some lager.

Given the manner in which I have disappointed comrades in the last few months with my political pragmatism/betrayal of socialist principles (delete as appropriate), this may come as no surprise.

As for justification of my newly revealed royalist tendencies, I can do little better than add a few thoughts to Simon’s excellently balanced post at Latte Labour on why he’ll be protesting against the royal wedding.   Simon makes excellent points for and against protesting, but I think his final judgment is wrong.

Of course I’m not a supporter of the monarchy.  Given a free vote in a referendum I’d certainly vote for abolition.   But the creation of a republic is not top of my political agenda.  The same applies, clearly, to Julia Gillard.

In the case of the royal wedding,  any argument about the extent to which a continued existence of the monarchy is or isn’t damaging to British (or perhaps more pertinently, Commonwealth) democracy is much less important than the question of why and people are actually having street parties.

Talking to people about what’s being planned locally round my way, it has become fairly clear that the parties are not the same as the ones that were held in 1981.   The early 1980s reverence for royalty has largely gone, and been replaced by a knowing irony about it all, fused with a celebrity age inquistiveness about the two ‘hot’ celebrities of the moment. 

The key reason my friends are having a party is because they’ve got an umexpected day off, and they like barbecques with beer when you don’t have to go to work next day.  The royal wedding is a good excuse for this, a bit like the state-sponsored promotion of catholic burning is a good excuse to get together every November. 

I think for lefties to protest about the royal wedding, while it is justifiable in one set of political/constitutional terms, risks more than ‘looking like an arsehole’, to use Simon’s eloquent terms. 

It also risks looking patronising towards a whole section of the population. because it  appears to assume that ordinary people up and down the country are being successfully subjected (geddit?) to a narrative of continued subservience to their betters, whereas in fact those ordinary people are actually pretty clued into what’s going on.

This doesn’t mean, I hasten to add, that the same principle of ‘listen to where the working class because they are right’ should always apply to the Left.  

When I get round to it, I’ll be writing at length about Blue Labour and imimigration, and in this context I’ll argue quite happily and unashamedly about rightwing hegemony and the need for ‘conscientization’ (while also taking on board Lenin’s useful recent piece on Blue Labour’s deliberate contortion of what the working class actually thinks about immigration). 

Yes, there are conceptual difficulties here associated with the notion of a leftwing vanguard imposing a consciousness from above, but these difficulties are worth tackling when it comes to tackling what may be a dangerous new rise of nationalism within the so-called labour movement.

But these are not difficulties that it’s worth tackling when it comes to the royal wedding. 

Better, I contend, to give credit where credit is due, accept that in general people know pretty well how the monarchy sits in the 21st century – an odd but increasingly Hello-friendly anachronism which over the next generation may well be reduced in scale and constitutional importance through a process of  ‘attrition-by-fading-celebrity-lustre’.  A bit like Kerry Katona, but with less burgers.

Better, ultimately, to have regard to Owen’s earnest exhortations for lefties to have a laugh at times, over and above Simon’s earnest advice on the need for slightly reluctant bolshiness, and get down the Co-op for some lager before it runs out.


Categories: General Politics
  1. April 26, 2011 at 12:28 pm

    I doubt I’d protest it even if I felt stronger. Republicans aren’t challenging the spectacle of the wedding; they’ve been assimilated into it.

  2. CharlieMcMenamin
    April 26, 2011 at 3:05 pm

    There is an third alternative to ‘making an arse of oneself by demonstrating’ or ‘giving in and joining it’. It’s having a Republican celebration.

  3. April 26, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    I agree with Charlie. Or why not go to a wedding party and try engaging people in some political discussions about the monarchy? Might be interesting to see what response that gets.

  4. April 26, 2011 at 3:34 pm

    Blimey, have you ever tried having a political discussion with a Monarchist, you’ll tear out your eyes before making sense of it all.

  5. Stephen
    April 26, 2011 at 5:30 pm

    Of course the (minor) fiscal stimulus , day off and all round jollity surrounding the royal family could all be replicated were it centred round , not a wedding but a French style send off…just a thought

  6. paulinlancs
    April 26, 2011 at 7:39 pm

    @2,@3,@4 @3’s suggestion is precisely what I have been doing, pre-party, and may get into on Friday (though football chat may dominate). It’s this chatting that made me write this post. Indeed, the ironic way in which affairs will be conducted may well have elements of @2’s suggestions in as well, though not explicitly.

    My point is that parties with this knowing meh-to-the-royals will be happening up and down the country, without us having to act as persuaders. I think it’s indicative that the number of applciation to close streets etc shot up not, I suggest, because of a royal fervour surge, but because it got sunny and warm

  7. April 26, 2011 at 9:47 pm

    Interesting post. I’m probably going to say something about this line of argument later in the week. But, in brief, nobody is advocating demonstrating against royal wedding *parties*.

  8. tim f
    April 26, 2011 at 10:15 pm

    Paul, I take your point. Even half agree with it. But just as it’s patronising to assume that everyone who’s using the holiday as an excuse for a knowing semi-ironic piss-up is a massive monarchist, it’s patronising to assume working-class people will automatically assume anyone who just can’t be doing with the whole thing is an asshole. I think most people understand that some of us just see the celebrations as them rubbing their privilege in our faces, and don’t want anything to do with it.

    Or, in other words, if I’m going to have a party, I’ll bloody well do it on my terms, not when they tell me to.

    I won’t be protesting either, though. Not sure the royals are worth it, frankly. I’ll just be getting on with things.

  9. Chris
    April 28, 2011 at 8:39 pm

    Abolishing the monarchy should be the left’s top priority. Otherwise we take this “oh well, it’s not a priority” attitude and liberation never comes.

    Get them out.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 145 other followers

%d bloggers like this: