Home > Law > Sentencing women

Sentencing women

The detective who sought to make money from selling information to the News of the World has been sentenced to 15 months in prison.  This is less time in prison than the conviction would normally have carried:

[T]he judge said had that not been the case she would have been sentenced to three years.  The judge said he was particularly concerned about the child, and admitted that her absence while she is in prison could be damaging.  However, he said that, had she not been arrested, the detective would have returned to work by now, and therefore the child would be cared for by others anyway.

I am pleased that she will spend less time in prison than she might, and that assuming good behaviour she will be reunited with her child in a few months.   But what strikes me is that the matter of adoption, as opposed to simply having a child, seems to have been given greater weight than it does in most other sentencing of women, in less high profile cases.

The Corston Coalition points out that:

Imprisonment also has a serious impact on women’s children: ninety-five per cent of the children of women offenders have to leave their home on the conviction of their mother.

But, as the Coalition then points out:

The number of women sentenced to custody has increased by more than half between 1998 and 2008.  In 2008, 8,862 women, not including those on remand, were sentenced to custody. In the last decade, the women’s prison population has risen by 44 per cent; in comparison, the male prison population has risen by 26 per cent.

Clearly the judge in this case felt the crime was of such gravity that the need for a prison sentence outweighed the needs of the child.   I can (nearly) understand that, given the principle of vengeance written into our criminal justice system.

Yet for the vast majority of women sent to prison, there are clear, viable and effective non-prison options, and they still get sent down.

Let us hope, at least, that the judge’s sentence mitigation in this case will create some form of precedent in less high-profile cases.

Categories: Law
  1. john malpas
    February 2, 2013 at 1:42 am

    So equality is for women till the going gets rough and then it is time for petticoats .
    As for the children – dont men have children or once again are children an ever useful excuse for women to use when wanted .

  2. Chris
    February 2, 2013 at 7:33 pm

    “Yet for the vast majority of women sent to prison, there are clear, viable and effective non-prison options, and they still get sent down.”


  3. February 3, 2013 at 7:14 pm

    So when the same crime is committed by a male and a female the female should be sentenced by quite different criteria as they are defined not as responsible adults but as wives and mothers?

    You really do need to rethink this,….

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 145 other followers

%d bloggers like this: